ArticleInternational journal for equity in health2026
Beyond the Gini index: a poverty-normalized spatial Bayesian model for assessing territorial inequality.
Article in International journal for equity in health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe Gini index is one of the most widely used measures of income inequality. However, it has limitations in allowing reliable comparisons across areas with different socio-economic structures, particularly in small populations, where the index can be highly unstable. This study explores a simple modification of the Gini index that can overcome some of these limitations.
methodsWe propose a modification of the original Gini index that incorporates the poverty rate as an offset. Combined with Bayesian spatial modelling, this approach improves the precision and comparability of small-area estimates, by providing measures of inequality conditional on local poverty levels. To illustrate it, income data from 8,043 Spanish municipalities for the year 2022 were used, and the spatial patterns of the normalized Gini index were compared with those obtained from the original index.
resultsThe normalized Gini index revealed spatial inequality patterns that were overlooked by the original index. The new approach identified municipalities with higher levels of inequality than expected given their poverty rates in Andalusia, Extremadura, and Murcia, in contrast to lower inequality in Catalonia, Basque Country, Madrid, and Balearic Islands. In addition, while the original Gini index increased with population density and urbanization, the normalized version showed an opposite trend, with higher relative inequality observed in rural and low-density municipalities after accounting for local poverty levels.
conclusionsGiven its simplicity, reliance on widely available indicators, and adaptability to different territorial scales, the proposed method offers a useful measure for describing income inequality conditional on a region's poverty level and informing local redistributive policies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.