ArticleBMC medical education2026
Who will keep patients safe? The largest multi-centre survey of healthcare students exposes critical gaps in radiation safety education.
Article in BMC medical education, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe increasing use of ionising radiation in medical diagnostics highlights the need for adequate education of future healthcare professionals in radiation protection. This study aimed to assess the level of radiation safety knowledge among healthcare students across different disciplines and years of study.
methodsA cross-sectional survey was conducted among 1,161 students from three Polish medical universities, representing medicine, nursing, radiography, physiotherapy, and paramedic programmes. The questionnaire evaluated knowledge of radiation protection principles, identification of imaging modalities involving ionising radiation, and estimation of relative radiation doses.
resultsThe mean percentage of correct answers was 30.1% (SD = 13.9%), indicating generally low levels of knowledge. Fifth-year students achieved the highest scores (41.7%), while fourth-year students performed the worst (23.4%). Physiotherapy students obtained the highest mean scores (36.7%), whereas paramedic students scored the lowest (25.9%). Significant differences were observed between years of study and fields of study (p < 0.001), although effect sizes were small. No significant differences were found between universities (p = 0.063). Students performed best in identifying imaging modalities and worst in radiation dose estimation. Notably, 21% of respondents reported no interest in radiation protection.
conclusionsHealthcare students demonstrate insufficient knowledge of radiation protection, with only limited improvement across years of study. These findings highlight the need for structured, curriculum-integrated education to improve awareness and safe use of ionising radiation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.