ArticleBMC medical education2026
Predicting general practice trainee summative fellowship exam performance using commencement-of-training formative assessments: a retrospective cohort study.
Article in BMC medical education, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Yonder.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundFellowship examinations in Australian vocational general practice training assess competency for unsupervised practice. Early identification of trainees at risk of failing these summative examinations facilitates pro-active remediation. This study aimed to explore the utility of formative pre-general practice assessments (PGAs), undertaken at the commencement of training, for predicting final summative examination performance.
methodsThis was a retrospective cohort study. The PGAs included a written, short-answer, five-case Key Feature Problems test ('PGA-KFP') and an Objective Structured Clinical Examination ('PGA-OSCE'). Multivariable regression was used to examine the relationship between these PGAs and standardized scores on first-attempts at three summative fellowship examinations (an Applied Knowledge Test ('Fellowship-AKT'), a KFP ('Fellowship-KFP') and an OSCE ('Fellowship-OSCE'); and passing all three (versus failing at least one) examination on first attempt. Registrar demographics and training-related factors were included as covariates.
resultsHigher PGA-KFP and PGA-OSCE scores were univariably associated with higher Fellowship-AKT, Fellowship-KFP, and Fellowship-OSCE scores (all p-values ≤ 0.002) and with passing all three examinations on first attempt (p < 0.006). On multivariable analyses, higher PGA-KFP and PGA-OSCE scores were significantly associated with higher Fellowship-AKT, Fellowship-KFP (p values ≤ 0.016) but not Fellowship-OSCE scores. Higher PGA-KFP scores were also predictive of passing all three Fellowship exams on first attempt (p < 0.001).
conclusionsThis study found intensive formative assessments conducted at the commencement of training to be predictive of final fellowship examination performance in an apprenticeship-based model of general practice training. This suggests utility of these assessments for early-identification of trainees in need of proactive remediation both in Australia and internationally. Further research is required to explore predictive utility of less resource-intensive PGAs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.