Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42192390›Full record

ArticleBMC medical education2026

Point-of-care ultrasound in prehospital emergency care: attitudes, facilitators and barriers.

Alaa O Oteir, Maram Alakhras, Zainab Alqudah, Maryam Yagbeh, Rasha Buhumaid, Liqaa Rafee, Brett Williams

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical education, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Alaa O OteirDepartment of Allied Medical Sciences, Faculty of Applied Medical Sciences, Jordan University of Science and Technology, P.O. Box 3030, Irbid, 22110, Jordan. aooteir@just.edu.jo.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3156-2773
Maram AlakhrasDepartment of Allied Medical Sciences, Faculty of Applied Medical Sciences, Jordan University of Science and Technology, P.O. Box 3030, Irbid, 22110, Jordan.
Zainab AlqudahDepartment of Allied Medical Sciences, Faculty of Applied Medical Sciences, Jordan University of Science and Technology, P.O. Box 3030, Irbid, 22110, Jordan.
Maryam YagbehDepartment of Allied Medical Sciences, Faculty of Applied Medical Sciences, Jordan University of Science and Technology, P.O. Box 3030, Irbid, 22110, Jordan.
Rasha BuhumaidDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Mohammed Bin Rashid University of Medicine and Health Sciences, Dubai, United Arab Emirates.
Liqaa RafeeDepartment of Accidents and Emergency Medicine, Jordan University of Science and Technology, Irbid, Jordan.
Brett WilliamsDuke Medical School, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThis study aimed to explore Emergency Medical Services (EMS) providers' perceptions of prehospital Point-of-Care Ultrasound (POCUS), including perceived usefulness, facilitators, and barriers to its implementing in Jordanian prehospital settings.

methodsA multicenter cross-sectional study was conducted among EMS providers using a structured questionnaire. Attitudes were measured using a four-point Likert scale, while facilitators and barriers were assessed with dichotomous (yes/no) responses. A total attitude score was calculated by summing Likert-scale responses. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize responses and inferential analyses (independent-samples t-tests and ANOVA) were conducted to examine group differences. Internal consistency was evaluated using Cronbach's alpha and Kuder-Richardson Formula 20 (KR-20).

resultsA total of 621 participants were included in the study. The majority were males (78.3%), with a mean age of 29.5 ± 4.4 years and EMS experience of 9.7 ± 4.6 years. Only 23.3% reported previous POCUS training. Overall, participants demonstrated a net positive attitude toward POCUS (mean score = 27.9 ± 5.4; Cronbach's α = 0.836), though a substantial proportion (50.0%) expressed uncertainty regarding an absolute POCUS safety claim, a pattern that was independent of prior training status. A proportion of 79.6% expressed willingness to learn about POCUS, 79.4% agreed that POCUS supports standard assessment and 78.8% agreed that POCUS provides additional information for decision-making. The three main reported motivators were training availability (83.1%), direct supervision during use (81.8%) and institutional support (79.4%). The three main barriers were lack of time (76.7%), unavailability of training programs (74.2%) and lack of POCUS experts (73.4%). Participants with prior POCUS training had significantly higher attitude scores (p = .001).

conclusionEMS providers in Jordan demonstrated a net positive attitude toward POCUS as a potentially useful adjunct to prehospital care, though a substantial proportion expressed safety-related uncertainty, consistent with the absence of routine operational exposure to the technology. Adoption of POCUS remains constrained by structural and training-related barriers. These findings reflect perceived value rather than demonstrated clinical effectiveness. Addressing gaps in training, supervision, competency-based credentialing and imaging governance may support future integration, but further research is required to evaluate clinical and operational outcomes.

Indexed as

Attitude of Health PersonnelEmergency Medical ServicesPoint-of-Care SystemsAdultCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleSurveys and QuestionnairesUltrasonographyBarriersEmergency RadiologyMotivatorsPOCUSPoint-of-care ultrasoundPrehospital, Emergency Medical Services

Identifiers

PMID42192390
PMCPMC13393463

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.