Observational studyBMC medical education2026
Debriefing in practice: a cross-sectional observational study of self-reflection competence, psychological safety and speak-up in paramedic training.
Observational study in BMC medical education, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDebriefing is a central component of workplace-based learning in the training of paramedics. While their effects are well documented in simulation and hospital settings, little is known about how debriefing quality, psychological safety, speak-up behaviour, and self-reflection competence are interrelated in real-world emergency medical service settings. The aim of this study was to investigate these relationships and analyze potential differences between paramedic trainees and paramedic field instructors.
methodsA cross-sectional observational study was conducted using a standardized online survey tool (July-November 2025). The study aimed to assess psychological safety, speak-up behaviour, perceived debriefing quality, and self-reflection competence. Data were analyzed descriptively and using group-specific Pearson correlations.
resultsA total of 177 participants, including 61 paramedic field instructors and 116 trainees, were analyzed. Trainees and paramedic field instructors differed significantly with regard to debriefing quality (p < .001) and self-reflection competence (p < .05), while no significant differences were observed for psychological safety or speak-up. Among paramedic field instructors, self-reflection competence correlated strongly with debriefing quality (r = .67; p < .001). Among trainees, the strongest correlation was found between psychological safety and debriefing quality (r = .61; p < .001). Psychological safety was significantly associated with utilization of speak-up in both groups.
conclusionsDebriefing should not be considered merely as retrospective discussions, but rather as learning environments that are intentionally designed. The findings suggest that debriefing quality is closely associated with reflective facilitation and a psychologically safe environment, particularly for trainees. The training of on-the-job instructors should therefore specifically address, in addition to methodological facilitation skills, the design of interactions that promote reflection and foster a sense of safety, in order to sustainably improve learning, speak-up culture, and team communication.
trial registrationThis study is registered in "Deutsches Register Klinischer Studien" (DRKS-ID: DRKS00037257, Registration Date: 03.07.2025).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.