Observational studyBMC urology2026
Could miRNAs be used as markers for distinguishing undescended testes from retractile testes? A prospective controlled pilot/exploratory study.
Observational study in BMC urology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07315737 (miRNAs Associated With Undescended and Retractile Testes), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
miRNAs Associated With Undescended and Retractile Testes
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundUndescended testes (UDTs) are common in male infants. Untreated UDT poses risks such as infertility (IF), testicular cancer (TC), and testicular torsion (TT). Retractile testes (RTs) sporadically ascend from the scrotum. UDT requires early surgical correction, whereas RT requires only periodic follow-up. Differentiating these conditions is challenging, making clinical biomarkers potentially useful. The aim of our study was to examine the use of miRNAs as biomarkers in the differential diagnosis of UDT and RT which are difficult to differentiate.
methodsThis prospective pilot/exploratory study included 10 boys with UDT (operated), 9 with RT (followed), and 9 controls. Only palpable (unilateral or bilateral) UDT cases were included, excluding nonpalpable types. To ensure accurate RT diagnosis, initial physician examinations were performed in three positions (supine, semi-supine, standing), followed by a 1-month parental examination (twice daily). Only RT patients whose testes spent > 50% of their time in the scrotum were included. The exclusion criteria also included prior inguinal/scrotal surgery, defective datasets, or unsuitable serum samples. Parent consent and serum samples were collected to evaluate miR-210, miR-34c, and miR-449a expression via real-time PCR.
resultsStatistical analysis revealed no significant difference in miR-34c (p = 0.157) or miR-210 (p = 0.950) expression. However, the miR-449a level differed significantly between the groups (p = 0.033). Dunn-Bonferroni post hoc correction revealed significantly greater miR-449a in the RT group than in the UDT group (p < 0.05). No difference in miR-449a expression was found between the control and UDT groups (p > 0.05). Serum miR-449a demonstrated significant diagnostic potential in differentiating UDT from retractile testis (AUC: 0.822, p = 0.017) with 90.0% sensitivity and 77.8% specificity. These findings suggest that miR-449a could serve as a promising non-invasive biomarker to distinguish true undescended testis from its clinical mimics.
conclusionsSerum miRNA levels represent a potential tool for differentiating UDT from RT. Our pilot/exploratory study partially corroborates this, but comprehensive prospective randomized trials with larger cohorts are essential to definitively clarify miRNA alterations for precise distinction.
trial registrationThis prospective case-control study was registered to clinicaltrials.gov database, 'retrospectively'. The trial registration number is: NCT07315737, the unique protocol ID is: 2022/25.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.