ArticleBMC medical imaging2026
Article in BMC medical imaging, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundSystematic data on
methodsIn this single-center retrospective analysis, 21 patients with pathologically confirmed chordoma and prior treatment underwent
resultsMetastatic disease was identified in 11 of 21 patients (52.4%). Metastases were found in bone (7 patients), soft tissue (8 patients), and lung (5 patients). Site-specific metabolic patterns emerged: pulmonary metastases had lower FDG avidity (median SUVmax 2.3) correlated with size, whereas bone and soft-tissue avidity (SUVmax 3.8-3.9) was size-independent. Notably, in 4 out of 21 patients (19.0%), PET/CT detected metastases outside the field of view of conventional imaging. Interobserver agreement was perfect for metastatic status and excellent for total lesion counts. A case illustrated differential treatment response linked to baseline metabolic avidity.
conclusions
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.