ArticleBMC ecology and evolution2026
Functional diversity patterns of urban and forest breeding birds across four city-forest pairs in China.
Article in BMC ecology and evolution, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Urbanisation has led to rapid declines in species richness, contributing to urban biotic homogenisation. Nonetheless, our understanding of the effects of urbanisation on functional community structures remains limited. During the 2023 breeding season, we employed a standardised point-count method to survey bird communities across four cities and their corresponding forest habitats in China, and compared the functional structural characteristics of urban and forest avian communities. Our results revealed that urban birds showed greater functional trait differences, which partially compensated for reduced species richness. While forest bird communities showed declines in species and functional richness with increasing latitude, urban communities displayed a weaker latitudinal trend, which we tentatively interpreted as a possible, but unconfirmed, buffering effect on the urban environment. However, we observed a decrease in functional redundancy and an imbalance within urban avian communities along the latitudinal gradient, suggesting potential shifts in the abundance-based community structure that merit further investigation. We caution that all latitudinal inferences are exploratory, as they are based on only four city-forest pairs, which severely limits statistical power and generalisability. Therefore, our findings should be viewed as hypothesis-generating rather than confirmatory. They provide preliminary evidence that the functional structure of urban avian communities may differ from that of forest communities; however, broader sampling across more cities and latitudes is needed to validate these patterns and draw firm conclusions about their stability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.