ArticleBMC microbiology2026
Predictive modeling and network analysis uncover novel regulators of multi-stress tolerance in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.
Article in BMC microbiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundUnderstanding molecular responses to multi-stress conditions in Saccharomyces cerevisiae is crucial for optimizing industrial strains and enhancing stress tolerance. This study uses machine learning and data mining approaches to unravel the critical genes by which Saccharomyces cerevisiae responds to integrated stresses.
resultsRNA-seq analysis was performed on 48 sequencing runs; the subsequent results were analyzed by Weighted Gene Co-expression Network Analysis, and a distinct red module consisting of 371 genes associated with stress response was identified. The Boruta feature selection algorithm was applied to this module, confirming 56 important genes while classifying others as tentative or unimportant. Subsequent Random Forest analysis refined this set by highlighting essential genes, achieving robust classification accuracy, and focusing intensely on the most relevant genes for stress adaptation. Our integrative computational approach, including Module Membership and Gene Significance tests and machine learning methods, identified known and unknown candidate genes linked to oxidative stress, osmotic stress, and glucose deprivation. Notably, PPN1, SAM3, PLN1, Icl1, CTA1, AMS1, GAC1, and ADH2 genes demonstrated significant roles in adaptation mechanisms under osmotic, oxidative, and acid stress.
conclusionThis preliminary study clarified the underlying molecular network responses to complex stress conditions in yeast, which can be applied for further efficient strain engineering to improve yeast robustness for industrial applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.