Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42192188›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

Parameter calibration of finite element model of reinforced concrete arch bridge based on ISOA-RBF neural network.

Wenping Peng, Zujun Zhang, Zhongchu Tian, Jijin Zhang, Guoliang Zeng

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Wenping PengHunan University of Arts and Science, Changde, 415000, Hunan, China. wenpingpeng@huas.edu.cn.
Zujun ZhangHunan University of Arts and Science, Changde, 415000, Hunan, China.
Zhongchu TianChangsha University of Science & Technology Hunan Province Research Center for Safety Control Technology and Equipment of Bridge Engineering, Changsha, 410114, Hunan, China.
Jijin ZhangGuizhou Road & Bridge Group Co., Ltd., Guiyang, 550001, Guizhou, China.
Guoliang ZengHunan University of Arts and Science, Changde, 415000, Hunan, China. bridgezgl3403@huas.edu.cn.

Funding

Doctoral Research Initiation Project of Hunan University of Arts and Science 21BSQD25 and 24BSQD45Hunan Natural Science Foundation of China 2022JJ50323National Natural Science Foundation of China 51478049Open Fund of Hunan Province Research Center for Safety Control Technology and Equipment of Bridge Engineering(Changsha University of Science & Technology) 21KC04Postgraduate Research and Innovation Project of Hunan CX20190660
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To achieve efficient and accurate finite element (FE) model updating for reinforced concrete (RC) arch bridges, this study proposes a novel methodology that integrates an Improved Seagull Optimization Algorithm (ISOA) with a Radial Basis Function (RBF) neural network. First, the base Seagull Optimization Algorithm (SOA) is enhanced through Logistics chaotic mapping and an adaptive attack strategy, forming the ISOA to improve search efficiency and convergence. Second, leveraging the superior nonlinear fitting capability of the RBF neural network, a surrogate model is constructed to map the relationship between key structural parameters and the corresponding static/dynamic responses of the bridge, thereby replacing the computationally expensive full FE model during iterative optimization. Finally, a multi-objective optimization model is formulated by combining static deflections (from arch T-beams) and modal frequencies, enabling a holistic FE model update based on in-situ load test data. The proposed ISOA-RBF framework is applied to a long-span RC arch bridge case study. Results demonstrate that: (1) the ISOA effectively solves the inverse optimization problem in FE model updating; (2) the RBF surrogate model achieves high approximation accuracy, with an average relative error of only 0.62% across 50 validation samples; (3) after updating, discrepancies between computed and measured T-beam deflections are significantly reduced, showing average relative errors below 10% under two static load cases; (4) errors in the first three modal frequencies are less than 5%, with good orthogonality maintained among modes and no modal mixing observed, confirming consistency in dynamic characteristics before and after model updating.

Indexed as

Finite element model updatingISOA-RBF neural networkLoad testReinforced concrete arch bridgeSurrogate model

Identifiers

PMID42192188
PMCPMC13438628

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.