ArticleScientific reports2026
Parameter calibration of finite element model of reinforced concrete arch bridge based on ISOA-RBF neural network.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
To achieve efficient and accurate finite element (FE) model updating for reinforced concrete (RC) arch bridges, this study proposes a novel methodology that integrates an Improved Seagull Optimization Algorithm (ISOA) with a Radial Basis Function (RBF) neural network. First, the base Seagull Optimization Algorithm (SOA) is enhanced through Logistics chaotic mapping and an adaptive attack strategy, forming the ISOA to improve search efficiency and convergence. Second, leveraging the superior nonlinear fitting capability of the RBF neural network, a surrogate model is constructed to map the relationship between key structural parameters and the corresponding static/dynamic responses of the bridge, thereby replacing the computationally expensive full FE model during iterative optimization. Finally, a multi-objective optimization model is formulated by combining static deflections (from arch T-beams) and modal frequencies, enabling a holistic FE model update based on in-situ load test data. The proposed ISOA-RBF framework is applied to a long-span RC arch bridge case study. Results demonstrate that: (1) the ISOA effectively solves the inverse optimization problem in FE model updating; (2) the RBF surrogate model achieves high approximation accuracy, with an average relative error of only 0.62% across 50 validation samples; (3) after updating, discrepancies between computed and measured T-beam deflections are significantly reduced, showing average relative errors below 10% under two static load cases; (4) errors in the first three modal frequencies are less than 5%, with good orthogonality maintained among modes and no modal mixing observed, confirming consistency in dynamic characteristics before and after model updating.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.