ArticleMolecular biology and evolution2026
Retrotransposed gene copies persist under relaxed selection in wild Spodoptera frugiperda.
Article in Molecular biology and evolution, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Copy number variations (CNVs) are major sources of genetic variation, affecting large portions of genomes. Typical CNVs are known to have short evolutionary half-lives due to deleterious effects, with documented events of adaptive evolution. However, it is not known whether the same trends apply to CNVs preserving intact Open Reading Frames (iORF-CNVs), which can encode functional proteins. Here, we investigate the mechanistic origins and evolutionary dynamics of iORF-CNVs in Spodoptera frugiperda, a globally distributed pest species where CNV-mediated adaptive evolution has been reported. Using PacBio HiFi reads, we generated high-quality, individually assembled genomes for 36 field-collected individuals and identified 349 genes with polymorphic iORF-CNVs. These elements are short, intronless, and display molecular signatures of LINE-mediated retrotransposition, including cis- and trans-acting effects. A majority of iORF-CNVs (68.0% to 77.28%) exhibited at least one molecular signature of retrotransposition. iORF-CNVs showed lower divergence at the first and second codon positions than at the third codon positions, but they had higher nonsynonymous-to-synonymous polymorphism ratios than non-iORF-CNV genes, implying purifying selection with relaxed constraint. Orthology analyses indicated that these CNVs originate from genes under weak evolutionary constraint, while transcriptomic and promoter motif analyses revealed that many are transcribed and retain regulatory features. We conclude that observed iORF-CNVs are generated through retrotransposition from weakly constrained genes and that the duplicates are selectively maintained for coding potential, albeit under reduced purifying selection compared with non-iORF-CNV genes. These results imply that pseudogenization is not an inevitable evolutionary fate of retrotransposed gene copies when the open reading frame is preserved.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.