ArticleScientific reports2026
Comprehensive method validation for detecting multiple pesticide residues in blood using ultra high performance liquid chromatography-high resolution mass spectrometry.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A comprehensive ultra-high-performance liquid chromatography-high-resolution mass spectrometry (UHPLC-HRMS) method was developed and validated for the simultaneous detection and quantification of 171 pesticide residues in wildlife blood samples. The method employed a modified QuEChERS (Quick, Easy, Cheap, Effective, Rugged, and Safe) extraction procedure, optimized for efficient recovery of analytes while minimizing matrix interferences. Chromatographic separation was achieved by optimizing the mobile phase, flow rate, and gradient programme, which significantly enhanced peak separation and stability. The mass spectrometric analysis was performed using a full scan-ddMS² mode in an Orbitrap mass spectrometer, with three intense precursor-to-fragment ion transitions for each pesticide. The method was validated according to SANTE guidelines, assessing linearity, recovery, precision, accuracy, matrix effect and limit of quantification (LOQ). The calibration curves exhibited strong linearity (R² = 0.990-0.999) over the concentration range of 1-250 µg L⁻¹. Mean recoveries for 109 pesticides ranged from 70% to 119% at 25 µg L⁻¹ spiking level, with relative standard deviations (RSD) below 20% for most compounds. LOQs ranged from 5.0 to 59.64 µg L⁻¹. The matrix effect was evaluated and addressed through matrix-matched calibration. The developed UHPLC-HRMS method enables sensitive, selective, and reliable quantification of a wide range of pesticides in blood, supporting long-term monitoring of pesticide exposure in wildlife and aiding conservation efforts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.