ArticleLeukemia2026
Artificial intelligence-enhancement of flow cytometry data accelerates the identification of measurable residual chronic lymphocytic leukemia.
Article in Leukemia, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- When MRD Is Not MRD: A Context-Dependent Interpretation in Clinical Decision-Making.European journal of haematology · 2026Article
- Article
- Artificial intelligence accelerates the interpretation of measurable residual B lymphoblastic leukemia by flow cytometry.Blood advances · 2026Article
- Artificial intelligence in haematology laboratory diagnosis: Current applications, challenges, and future directions.African journal of laboratory medicine · 2026Review
- Research advances in the adjunctive diagnosis of acute myeloid leukemia.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Flow cytometry (FC) is essential for detecting measurable residual disease (MRD) in chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL), but its use is limited by the expertise and time required for manual analysis. We developed an artificial intelligence (AI) pipeline, Clustering/Classification of All Events, Dimensionality reduction, Downsampling, and Aberrancy Scaling (CCADDAS), to automatically enhance raw FC files, streamlining CLL MRD detection using a single-tube 10-color panel. FC files from 166 MRD-positive and 61 MRD-negative cases were processed in a cloud environment. Automated steps included error correction (FlowCut), clustering (PARC), dimensionality reduction (UMAP), anomaly detection against negative controls, and cluster-informed downsampling that preserved rare MRD events. A deep neural network trained on expert-defined normal subsets enabled automated gating. AI-enhanced files were analyzed in standard FC software, yielding results highly concordant with conventional expert review (R² = 0.98). Downsampling reduced cellularity by 85% and file size by 78%, while retaining low-level MRD events. An AI-generated aberrancy scale distinguished CLL MRD from background B cells with excellent performance (AUC = 0.98). Manual analysis time decreased from 9.0 to 0.9 min per case (90% reduction). CCADDAS provides a largely unsupervised, software-agnostic method that accelerates and simplifies CLL MRD detection without compromising test performance compared to conventional analysis, enabling broader adoption of FC-based MRD testing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.