ArticleNPJ digital medicine2026
Personalized neoadjuvant treatment regimen selection in locally advanced rectal cancer based on regimen-specific response modeling.
Article in NPJ digital medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Neoadjuvant therapy is standard for locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC), yet regimen selection remains population-based, risking over- or undertreatment. We developed and validated a deep learning framework that provides a generalizable paradigm for data-driven treatment regimen selection by estimating patient-specific probabilities of pathological complete response (pCR) across multiple therapeutic options. In a multicenter cohort, a hard-gated mixture-of-experts model integrating pretreatment multiparametric MRI and clinical variables generated regimen-specific pCR probabilities to support clinician-led treatment decision-making. The model achieved strong predictive performance, with AUCs of 0.827 and 0.790 in the validation and prospective test cohorts. In the combined validation and test cohorts, 53.16% of patients were recommended treatment escalation, with an observed pCR rate of 11.11% and a model-estimated pCR probability of 30.95% under the model-supported regimen. Meanwhile, 5.91% of patients were identified for de-intensification while maintaining a high estimated likelihood of response. This framework provides probabilistic support for multidisciplinary optimization of neoadjuvant treatment intensity in LARC. The prospective cohort was registered in the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (ChiCTR2400085797; June 18, 2024).
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.