ArticleEnvironmental monitoring and assessment2026
Missing data imputation in hourly CO measurements for air quality monitoring: a case study in the city of Salvador, Brazil.
Article in Environmental monitoring and assessment, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Continuous and uninterrupted air quality monitoring is essential for environmental management and public policy formulation, which requires the absence of missing data and good quality measurements. However, due to a variety of factors (local power outages, data transmission, instrument calibration, preventive maintenance, weather conditions, etc.), measurement gaps with different time windows frequently occur in historical air quality data. This work addresses the problem of missing data in air quality monitoring time series, which compromises the quality of information and hinders decision-making related to air pollution. Carbon monoxide (CO) data were imputed in artificially generated gaps (from 24 to 72 h) for a monitoring station located in Salvador, Bahia (Brazil). Three dynamic modeling strategies with different architectures and learning algorithms were applied: XGboost and two recurrent neural networks (LSTM and RNN). The results showed that, although XGboost presented the lowest medians associated with RMSE and MAE distributions (0.1028 and 0.1266 ppm, respectively), the difference compared to the neural networks was not statistically significant. The statistical analysis of the predictions showed that the mean of the residuals does not differ significantly from zero, indicating an absence of systematic bias and suggesting that the imputed values preserve the dominant dynamics and seasonal patterns of the original series. The percentages of gaps consistently described by the models were 82.0% (XGboost) and 91.3% (LSTM and RNN recurrent neural networks). The results demonstrate that the adopted model structures (decision tree and recurrent neural networks), along with a systematic approach involving the analysis and preparation of the training sample (identification of input variables, mapping of existing gaps in the historical data of the measurement station, and generation of artificial gaps, among others), enabled the imputation of dynamic CO data, preserving the dominant behavior of the time series and ensuring the validity of environmental monitoring.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.