ArticleInternational journal of clinical oncology2026
Clinical effectiveness of intra-arterial chemoradiotherapy for advanced maxillary sinus carcinoma: based on the reports of the head and neck cancer registry of Japan.
Article in International journal of clinical oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundBased on the results of the JCOG1212 trial, superselective intra-arterial infusion chemoradiotherapy (IA-CRT) has become a standard treatment option for patients with locally advanced maxillary sinus carcinoma (LA-MSC), especially those with T4a disease, in Japan. This study aimed to evaluate the real-world effectiveness of IA-CRT compared with systemic intravenous chemoradiotherapy (IV-CRT) in patients with LA-MSC.
methodsWe retrospectively analyzed data from patients with T3 and T4 N0M0 maxillary sinus carcinoma who were treated with IA-CRT or IV-CRT between 2011 and 2017, using data from the Head and Neck Cancer Registry of Japan. The primary endpoint was the 5-year local control rate (LCR), and the secondary endpoints were overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). Survival analyses were performed using inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) adjustment.
resultsAmong 1,329 registered patients, 507 received definitive chemoradiotherapy as initial treatment, including 373 patients treated with IA-CRT (median follow-up, 46 months) and 134 treated with IV-CRT (median follow-up, 31 months). After IPTW adjustment, the 5-year LCR was significantly higher in the IA-CRT group than in the IV-CRT group (67.0% vs. 46.0%; hazard ratio, 0.61; 95% confidence interval, 0.44-0.84; p = 0.0023). OS and PFS showed no significant differences between the two groups.
conclusionsIA-CRT was associated with improved local control compared with IV-CRT in patients with LA-MSC. Although its impact on survival outcomes remains uncertain, these findings provide real-world evidence that complements the results of the JCOG1212 trial and inform treatment selection in routine clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42192044What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.