Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42192023›Full record

ArticleLasers in medical science2026

Systematic photodynamic therapy for concurrent cervical-vaginal high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion: a series of eight cases.

Yu Liu, Ruifang Wu, Changzhong Li, Ruizhen Li

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Lasers in medical science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Yu LiuCenter of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Peking University Shenzhen Hospital, Shenzhen, China.
Ruifang WuCenter of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Peking University Shenzhen Hospital, Shenzhen, China.
Changzhong LiCenter of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Peking University Shenzhen Hospital, Shenzhen, China.
Ruizhen LiCenter of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Peking University Shenzhen Hospital, Shenzhen, China. lrz6666@126.com.

Funding

Sanming Project of Medicine in Shenzhen SZSM202011016Shenzhen High-level Hospital Construction Fund YBH2019-260Shenzhen Key Laboratory on Technology for Early Diagnosis of Major Gynecologic Diseases SYSPG20241211173501001Shenzhen Key Medical Discipline Construction Fund SZXK027
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Concurrent cervical-vaginal high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (HSIL) is increasingly prevalent with carcinogenic potential. For gynecologic oncologists, non-invasive, organ-preserving treatment of this condition remains a challenge. While Hiporfin-photodynamic therapy (PDT) has proven effective for cervical HSIL or vaginal HSIL alone, its efficacy in concurrent cervical-vaginal HSIL remains unreported. We treated 8 pathologically confirmed patients with Hiporfin-PDT: 2.0 mg/kg intravenous Hiporfin followed by 630-nm red laser irradiation 48-72 h later, with one session per patient initially. At 3-6 months, the complete response (CR) rate was 75.0% (6/8); the 2 partial response (PR) patients achieved CR after a second PDT session or two sessions of thermocoagulation. Our preliminary findings suggest that Hiporfin-PDT has potential feasibility as a non-invasive option for concurrent cervical-vaginal HSIL, warranting further investigation.

Indexed as

PhotochemotherapyPhotosensitizing AgentsSquamous Intraepithelial LesionsUterine Cervical NeoplasmsVaginal NeoplasmsAdultFemaleHumansMiddle AgedRed LightTreatment OutcomePhotosensitizing AgentsCervical high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesionHiporfinPhotodynamic therapyVaginal high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion

Identifiers

PMID42192023
PMCPMC13212613

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.