ArticleAesthetic plastic surgery2026
Double-Sling Composite Facelift.
Article in Aesthetic plastic surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundVarious techniques have been evolved throughout the history of facelift surgeries, some being conservative while others radical, endangering facial nerves for better results. While plication techniques tighten the SMAS via sutures, SMAS flap techniques enable full mobility of the face for a stronger lift and enhanced longevity. Regardless of the technique, the midface is among the first on the "dissatisfaction list" with recurrences and insufficient lifting reported. True midfacial mobility is possible with complete release of the zygomatic ligaments and proper stabilization of the SMAS, or with subperiosteal midfacial repositioning techniques. The SMAS flap techniques (particularly an extended composite or high-SMAS) can elevate the midface effectively; however, the midfacial lift is more in a lateral vector. Suture-based techniques that lift the midface through the temporal approach on the other hand lift the midface in a more vertical vector; however, their means of stabilization are weaker as a consequence of cheese-wiring outcomes.
objectivesThe objective of this paper is to introduce into literature a SMAS flap technique utilizing 2 SMAS slings to elevate and stabilize the face, neck and midface in a three-vector, strong and effective yet long-lasting way.
methodsThe technique was performed in a selective group of the author's facial rejuvenation patients (n=72) from 2019 to 2025 age 39-75. Inclusion criteria were a sagging midface, no prior power-based procedure and primary facelift candidates. A modified composite facelift and necklift was performed under general anesthesia with elevation and preparation of two sling SMAS flaps additional to the classical high-SMAS flap vector. The transversely elevated superior sling flap was flipped and transported through the temporal tunnel to the superior temporal space. This flap was secured to the medial portion of the deep temporal fascia for the purpose of elevation and fixation of the midface to the temple. The vertical prepared inferior sling flap was rotated behind the ear and secured to the mastoid fascia for the purpose of lifting the neck (platysma) and demarcating the mandibular angle and jawline.
resultsSMAS elevation and release of the retaining ligaments enables full mobilization of the face required for a proper and efficient facelift surgery. Deep neck work on the other hand enables decompressing and controlling the sagging tissues of the neck and tightening of the platysma muscle. The double-sling SMAS flaps enable a strong, effective and long-lasting stabilization of the SMAS to the temple and the mastoid fascia in addition to the classical oblique vector. Midfacial elevation and stabilization are in a more vertical vector, the lower face in an oblique vector and the neck in a transverse vector, hence ensuring a natural facial rejuvenation.
conclusionsThe double-sling composite facelift technique enables mobilization of the SMAS and stabilizes it via "true" SMAS flaps in three different vectors simultaneously (specifically lifting the midface in a more vertical vector). This technique achieves effective rejuvenation with sub-SMAS dissection and retaining ligament release; prolonged longevity with SMAS flap stabilization; and post-surgery quick recovery due to limited skin dissection in the composite facelift approach. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE IV: Case series/surgical technical paper. This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .
Indexed as
Identifiers
42192009What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.