Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42191974›Full record

Observational studyJournal of epidemiology and global health2026

Candidiasis in Diabetes: Five-Year Retrospective on Glycaemic Control.

Aiah M Khateb, Walaa M Mohammedsaeed, Hajer Bin Shuraym, Zain J Alghamdi

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Journal of epidemiology and global health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Aiah M KhatebDepartment of Clinical Laboratory Sciences, Collage of Applied Medical Science, Taibah University, P.O.Box 344, Medina, 42353, Saudi Arabia. AKHATEB@taibahu.edu.sa.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7806-8748
Walaa M MohammedsaeedDepartment of Clinical Laboratory Sciences, Collage of Applied Medical Science, Taibah University, P.O.Box 344, Medina, 42353, Saudi Arabia.
Hajer Bin ShuraymDepartment of Clinical Laboratory Sciences, College of Applied Medical Sciences, King Saud Bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences, P.O. Box 3660, Riyadh, 11481, Saudi Arabia.
Zain J AlghamdiDepartment of Diabetes and Endocrinology, King Salman Medical City, Medina, Saudi Arabia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFungal infections are a significant global health burden, affecting over a billion individuals annually. Diabetes mellitus (DM) is a major risk factor, with over 7 million diabetic patients in Saudi Arabia. This study aimed to identify common fungal pathogens and associated risk factors in DM patients at King Fahad Hospital in Medina.

methodsA retrospective-observational study analyzed electronic records of DM patients with positive fungal cultures from 2016 to 2021. Data included demographics, medical history, fungal isolates, resistance patterns, and biochemical parameters.

resultsA 54.5 fold increase in fungal infections was observed over five years, likely reflects the synergistic impact of the COVID-19 pandemic and enhanced diagnostic surveillance alongside the physiological vulnerability of a growing diabetic population struggling with poor glycemic and renal management. Male DM patients had a higher incidence of candidiasis. Candida parapsilosis was the most common species, followed by C. albicans. High fasting glucose, elevated HbA1c, and increased creatinine levels were significantly associated with higher infection rates. Bloodstream infections were most prevalent, followed by cutaneous and respiratory infections. Resistance was observed primarily in hospitalized patients, with C. krusei, C. dubliniensis, and C. parapsilosis demonstrating significant resistance.

conclusionsThis study highlights the significant burden of fungal infections in DM patients in Saudi Arabia. Candida species were the predominant isolates. Elevated glycemic control and renal function were major risk factors. The lack of a national fungal infection surveillance program hinders accurate assessment of the true burden of this disease. These findings emphasize the need for improved diagnostic strategies, targeted antifungal therapies, and enhanced surveillance programs to effectively manage fungal infections in DM patients.

Indexed as

CandidiasisDiabetes ComplicationsDiabetes MellitusGlycemic ControlAdultAgedFemaleHumansIncidenceMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesRisk FactorsSaudi ArabiaDiabetesFungalGlycemic controlInfectionRisks

Identifiers

PMID42191974
PMCPMC13396308

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.