ArticleNeurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology2026
CAA or not? When cerebral microbleeds are not enough.
Article in Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Lobar cerebral microbleeds (CMBs) are significant indicators of cerebral amyloid angiopathy (CAA) and are increasingly recognized in both clinical and population studies. Although CMBs are common incidental findings, their progression in CAA patients underscores their diagnostic relevance. Recent criteria highlight additional markers of small vessel disease (SVD), such as white matter hyperintensities (WMHs) and enlarged perivascular spaces (EPVSs), yet the current diagnostic framework does not fully address the implications of multiple SVD markers. This case report discusses a 55-year-old man with a history of acute lymphoblastic leukemia who presented with recurrent vertigo and was initially suspected of having CAA due to MRI findings of CMBs. However, the absence of cortical CMBs, WMHs, and EPVSs, coupled with his history of whole brain radiotherapy (WBRT), led to the conclusion that the observed CMBs were likely long-term effects of WBRT. Follow-up MRI demonstrated the emergence of new CMBs, reinforcing the need for careful consideration of differential diagnoses in patients with a history of radiation therapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42191964What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.