ArticleSurgical endoscopy2026
Safety of laparoscopic incisional hernia repair after liver transplant: a comparative study from a single institution.
Article in Surgical endoscopy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionVentral incisional hernia (VIH) is a frequent complication after liver transplantation (LT), with incidence rates up to 46%. Repair in LT recipients is particularly challenging due to immunosuppression, comorbidities, and large hernia defects. While laparoscopic incisional hernia repair (LIHR) has shown advantages in the general population, comparative outcomes in LT patients remain underexplored. This study evaluates the safety and short-term outcomes of LIHR in LT recipients versus non-transplant patients.
methodsA retrospective cohort study was conducted of patients undergoing LIHR at a single institution. LT recipients (2016-2025) were compared to non-transplant patients (2020-2022). Demographics, comorbidities, operative variables, and postoperative outcomes-including surgical site occurrences (SSO), infections (SSI), recurrence, readmissions, and mortality-were analyzed. Propensity score matching (1:1) adjusted for baseline differences in age, gender, BMI, diabetes, hypertension, dyslipidemia, and chronic kidney disease.
resultsA total of 147 patients were included (42 LT; 105 non-LT). LT recipients were older, had higher rates of diabetes (38.1 vs. 14.3%) and chronic kidney disease (42.9 vs. 0.07%), and presented with larger hernia defects (median 120 vs. 27.5 cm
conclusionsLIHR in LT recipients is safe and effective, with comparable rates of infection, recurrence, and readmission to non-transplant patients. Increased SSOs in LT patients appear primarily driven by comorbidities and hernia complexity rather than surgical technique. Careful patient selection and perioperative optimization remain essential.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42191955What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.