Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42191946›Full record

Observational studyEuropean journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging2026

Yousif A Lucinian, Patrick Martineau, François Harel, Geneviève Giraldeau, Stéphanie Tan, Daniel Juneau, Matthieu Pelletier-Galarneau

Abstract readMulticenter StudyObservational Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Observational study in European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Yousif A LucinianDepartment of Medical Imaging, Institut de cardiologie de Montréal, 5000 Bélanger, Montréal, Québec, H1T1C8, Canada.
Patrick MartineauDepartment of Molecular Imaging and Therapy, BC Cancer, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
François HarelDepartment of Medical Imaging, Institut de cardiologie de Montréal, 5000 Bélanger, Montréal, Québec, H1T1C8, Canada.
Geneviève GiraldeauDepartment of Medicine, Institut de cardiologie de Montréal, Montréal, Canada.
Stéphanie TanDepartment of Medical Imaging, Institut de cardiologie de Montréal, 5000 Bélanger, Montréal, Québec, H1T1C8, Canada.
Daniel JuneauNuclear medicine division, Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal, Montréal, QC, Canada.
Matthieu Pelletier-GalarneauDepartment of Medical Imaging, Institut de cardiologie de Montréal, 5000 Bélanger, Montréal, Québec, H1T1C8, Canada. matthieu.pelletier-galarneau@icm-mhi.org.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeData on the use of fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT) in non-granulomatous myocarditis are limited, and no study has evaluated the diagnostic performance of combined FDG-PET and rest myocardial perfusion imaging (rMPI).

methodsWe conducted a multicenter prospective observational feasibility study of patients who underwent combined FDG-PET/CT with rMPI as well as cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) for suspected myocarditis. When available, endomyocardial biopsy (EMB) established the diagnosis according to consensus criteria. Otherwise, the final adjudicated clinical diagnosis served as the reference standard. All patients had a minimum follow-up of 12 months following PET imaging.

resultsTwenty-five patients were included, of whom 18 (72%) were diagnosed with myocarditis. FDG-PET and rMPI demonstrated a sensitivity/specificity of 61%/100%, and 59%/71%, respectively. Inter-reader agreement for FDG-PET was excellent (κ = 0.84, 95% CI 0.62-1.00). The combination of FDG-PET and rMPI yielded a sensitivity of 82% (95% CI: 50-93%) and a specificity of 71% (95% CI: 29-96%). Late gadolinium enhancement (LGE), excluding isolated subendocardial patterns, showed a sensitivity/specificity of 72%/57%. Spatial agreement between rMPI perfusion defects and LGE on CMR was modest (κ = 0.35, 95%CI: 0.23-0.47).

conclusionCombining FDG-PET with rMPI may be a feasible imaging modality for detecting non-granulomatous myocarditis by capturing both inflammatory and fibrotic components across different disease stages.

Indexed as

Fluorodeoxyglucose F18Myocardial Perfusion ImagingMyocarditisPositron Emission Tomography Computed TomographyAdultFeasibility StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesRadiopharmaceuticalsRestFluorodeoxyglucose F18RadiopharmaceuticalsCMRFDGFluorodeoxyglucoseInflammationMyocarditisPositron emission tomographyRubidium

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.