ArticleEuropean journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging2026
The FAP-FDG Integration Score (FFIS): Development and prognostic validation of a dual-tracer PET phenotype for solid tumors.
Article in European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeTo develop a FAP-FDG integrated score (FFIS) based on [
methodsThis retrospective study included 193 patients with solid tumors who underwent both [
resultsFFIS emerged as an independent predictor of OS in both univariate (HR = 1.79, P < 0.001) and multivariate (HR = 1.75, P < 0.001) analyses. A higher FFIS reliably predicted worse survival: no deaths occurred among patients of score 1, whereas the median OS was 36, 13, and 8 months for scores 2, 3, and 4, respectively (Log-Rank P < 0.0001). This prognostic stratification remained consistent nearly all clinical subgroups (P-interaction > 0.05). In contrast, FDG-SUVmax showed no independent prognostic value, and FAP-SUVmax was predictive only in univariate analysis (HR = 1.04, P = 0.03).
conclusionBy integrating metabolic and stromal information, the FFIS may offer preliminary prognostic value across solid tumors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42191945What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.