ArticleScientific reports2026
Predictive metacognition: a neuro-computational framework for self-monitoring in large language models.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Large Language Models demonstrate remarkable capabilities but suffer from critical metacognitive deficits, manifesting as overconfidence and hallucination, which severely limit their deployment in high-stakes applications. We introduce Predictive Metacognition, a neurobiologically-inspired framework that integrates principles of predictive processing and anterior cingulate cortex monitoring into transformer architectures. Our approach implements Error-Driven Learning and Dual-Process Monitoring through specialised fine-tuning that trains models to simultaneously generate responses and assess their own performance reliability. We fine-tuned Llama-3-8B-Instruct and Phi-3-Mini-4k-Instruct using LoRA (rank=8, [Formula: see text]) on 4,000 strategically constructed examples spanning varying confidence levels. Comprehensive evaluation against state-of-the-art baselines, including GPT-4o and Claude-3.5-Sonnet, revealed statistically significant improvements in confidence calibration. Our metacognitive models achieved substantial reductions in Brier Score (11.6% and 17.2% respectively) and Expected Calibration Error ([Formula: see text], Cohen's [Formula: see text]). Critically, these improvements generalised robustly to out-of-domain tasks while maintaining competitive task accuracy. This work establishes a computationally tractable implementation of biologically-inspired metacognitive architecture for large language models, offering a principled pathway towards AI systems capable of reliable intrinsic self-monitoring that can more accurately assess their own knowledge boundaries and express appropriate uncertainty.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.