ArticleScientific reports2026
Uncertainty estimation and probabilistic skull shape reconstruction using bayesian neural networks.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
3D shape reconstruction is an active area of research and a fundamental problem in computer vision, with growing applications in the medical domain, where it enables the recovery of missing or fine anatomical structures. Numerous approaches have been proposed for medical shape reconstruction, emphasizing accurate and anatomically plausible reconstructions. However, 3D shape reconstruction remains an inherently ill-posed problem, meaning (1) both neural network-based methods and conventional shape modeling approaches naturally introduce uncertainty in their predictions, and (2) multiple anatomically plausible reconstructions exist for a given partial or low-resolution input. While the uncertainty aspects have been widely explored in general computer vision, they remain relatively under-explored in the context of medical shape reconstruction. In this paper, we developed a 3D Bayesian U-Net and investigated its use for uncertainty estimation and probabilistic reconstructions across three key tasks: cranial reconstruction, facial reconstruction, and skull shape super-resolution. Our findings show that the Bayesian model is able to produce a range of anatomically plausible skull reconstructions while capturing natural skull variations arising from the learned weight uncertainty. Notably, these variations are primarily expressed through differences in bone thickness, which aligns with anatomical expectations, particularly relevant in real-world applications like cranial implant design. Additionally, we propose a principled framework to study the relationship between weight uncertainty and reconstruction uncertainty by analyzing the learned posterior distribution of the weights, demonstrating that our Bayesian U-Net achieves comparable reconstruction performance to a deterministic U-Net baseline while providing reliable uncertainty estimates. Our study also reveals a clear cross-task uncertainty pattern, where tasks with stronger structural constraints, like super-resolution, yield lower predictive uncertainty, while less constrained tasks, like facial reconstruction, result in higher uncertainty. Refer to the project page for more visual results https://git.zib.de/jli/uncertainty-aware-skull-reconstruction/ .
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.