ArticleScientific reports2026
Enhanced convolutional neural networks by using adaptive conditional dropout with dynamic regularization.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Deep convolutional networks have high capacity and thus tend to overfit, especially when trained on restricted or imbalanced data, which compromises their applicability to safety applications. To address this, we propose Conditional Dropout with Dynamic Regularization (CDDR), a simple phase aware regularization method that requires no architectural changes. In CDDR, dropout is completely disabled during the first four epochs to encourage dropout free feature learning. From the fifth epoch onward, the dropout rate is adaptively determined depending on the derivative of the first order of the training loss, and then its value is fixed for the remainder of training. Meanwhile, the L2 weight decay strength is also updated according to training dynamics. Additionally, during training the CDDR method uses the conditional dropout technique, and optionally at the time of inference, Monte Carlo Dropout is applied in order to approximate predictive uncertainty. When applied to VGG-16 and ResNet-18 on CIFAR-10, CIFAR-100, and Tiny ImageNet, CDDR surpass DropBlock, standard Dropout, and SpatialDropout, by achieving up to + 3.3% on CIFAR-10, + 9.27% on CIFAR-100, and + 3.94% on Tiny ImageNet while reducing the train test gap by 58.8% on CIFAR-100. These results show the effectiveness of CDDR in enhancing current CNN structures, especially in applications where data scarcity and class imbalance occur.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.