ArticleScientific reports2026
A causal discovery framework for analyzing the impact mechanism of generative AI on digital literacy: an LLM-based behavioral analysis approach.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The widespread application of generative AI in higher education has raised questions about how AI usage behaviors relate to students' development of digital literacy. Existing research relies predominantly on correlation analysis, leaving potential causal pathways underexplored. This study proposes CD-LLM (Causal Discovery from LLM interaction logs), a hybrid causal discovery framework designed to explore potential causal pathways between AI usage behaviors and digital literacy from large-scale interaction logs. Experiments were conducted using 8,456 interaction records from the WildChat dataset, with digital literacy approximated using behavioral proxies aligned with the DigComp 2.2 framework. Results demonstrate that CD-LLM achieves an F1 score of 0.802 and a structural Hamming distance of 10.3, representing improvements of 12.0% and 23.7%, respectively, over the best baseline FGES. The framework proposes 21 data-consistent causal hypotheses among 16 variables, suggesting that interaction features may mediate relationships between prompt characteristics and digital literacy outcomes, with 85.7% of edges exceeding the 0.75 reliability threshold.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.