Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42191730›Full record

ArticleNature communications2026

Reply to: "No evidence of neural feature-specific pre-activation during the prediction of an upcoming stimulus".

Gianpaolo Demarchi, Thomas Hartmann, Anne Hauswald, Juliane Schubert, Lisa Reisinger, Pavlos Topalidis, Kaja Benz, Fabian Schmidt, Quirin Gehmacher, Nathan Weisz

Abstract readLetter
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Gianpaolo DemarchiCentre for Cognitive Neuroscience, Department of Psychology, Paris-Lodron-University of Salzburg, Salzburg, Austria. gianpaolo.demarchi@plus.ac.at.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7597-9298
Thomas HartmannCentre for Cognitive Neuroscience, Department of Psychology, Paris-Lodron-University of Salzburg, Salzburg, Austria.
Anne HauswaldCentre for Cognitive Neuroscience, Department of Psychology, Paris-Lodron-University of Salzburg, Salzburg, Austria.
Juliane SchubertCentre for Cognitive Neuroscience, Department of Psychology, Paris-Lodron-University of Salzburg, Salzburg, Austria.
Lisa ReisingerCentre for Cognitive Neuroscience, Department of Psychology, Paris-Lodron-University of Salzburg, Salzburg, Austria.
Pavlos TopalidisCentre for Cognitive Neuroscience, Department of Psychology, Paris-Lodron-University of Salzburg, Salzburg, Austria.
Kaja BenzCentre for Cognitive Neuroscience, Department of Psychology, Paris-Lodron-University of Salzburg, Salzburg, Austria.
Fabian SchmidtCentre for Cognitive Neuroscience, Department of Psychology, Paris-Lodron-University of Salzburg, Salzburg, Austria.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9839-1614
Quirin GehmacherCentre for Cognitive Neuroscience, Department of Psychology, Paris-Lodron-University of Salzburg, Salzburg, Austria.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9407-2763
Nathan WeiszCentre for Cognitive Neuroscience, Department of Psychology, Paris-Lodron-University of Salzburg, Salzburg, Austria.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7816-0037

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Identifiers

PMID42191730
PMCPMC13212686

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.