Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42191715›Full record

ArticleNature communications2026

Predictive acoustical processing in human cortical layers.

Lonike K Faes, Isma Zulfiqar, Luca Vizioli, Zidan Yu, Yuan-Hao Wu, Jiyun N Shin, Martijn A Cloos, Ryszard Auksztulewicz, Lucia Melloni, Kamil Uludag and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Lonike K Faes *Department of Cognitive Neuroscience, Faculty of Psychology and Neuroscience, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands. faes0003@umn.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9792-6130
Isma Zulfiqar *Department of Cognitive Neuroscience, Faculty of Psychology and Neuroscience, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Luca VizioliCenter for Magnetic Resonance Research, Department of Radiology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, USA.
Zidan YuCenter for Advanced Imaging Innovation and Research (CAI2R), Department of Radiology, New York University School of Medicine, New York, USA.
Yuan-Hao WuNeuroscience Institute, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, USA.
Jiyun N ShinDepartment of Neurology, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, USA.
Martijn A CloosCenter for Advanced Imaging Innovation and Research (CAI2R), Department of Radiology, New York University School of Medicine, New York, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0636-234X
Ryszard AuksztulewiczDepartment of Education and Psychology, Free University Berlin, Berlin, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9078-3667
Lucia MelloniDepartment of Neurology, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, USA.
Kamil UludagHarquail Centre for Neuromodulation, Hurvitz Brain Sciences Program, Sunnybrook Research Institute, Toronto, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2813-5930
Essa YacoubCenter for Magnetic Resonance Research, Department of Radiology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, USA.
Federico De MartinoDepartment of Cognitive Neuroscience, Faculty of Psychology and Neuroscience, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0352-0648

Funding

The Neuronal Underpinnings of Non-invasive Laminar fMRIRF1MH116978 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI DEVINSKY, ORRIN, YACOUB, ESSA · 2018 to 2018
$2.9M
EC | EU Framework Programme for Research and Innovation H2020 | H2020 Priority Excellent Science | H2020 European Research Council (H2020 Excellent Science - European Research Council) 101001270NIMH NIH HHS RF1 MH116978
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In our dynamic environments, predictive processing is vital for auditory perception and its associated behaviors. Predictive coding formalizes inferential processes by implementing them as information exchange across cortical layers and areas. With laminar-specific blood oxygenation level-dependent imaging we measured responses to a cascading oddball paradigm, to ground predictive auditory processes on the mesoscopic human cortical architecture. Using a modeling approach, we derive putative changes in neural dynamics while accounting for draining effects. We show that the violations of predictions are potentially hierarchically organized and associated with responses in superficial layers of the planum polare and middle layers of the lateral temporal cortex. Moreover, we relate the updating of the brain's internal model to changes in deep layers. Our results support the role of temporal cortical architecture in the implementation of predictive coding and highlight the ability of laminar fMRI to investigate mesoscopic processes in a large extent of temporal areas.

Indexed as

Auditory CortexAuditory PerceptionTemporal LobeAcoustic StimulationAdultBrain MappingFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleModels, NeurologicalYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID42191715
PMCPMC13389289

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.