ArticleNPJ vaccines2026
Seasonal influenza mRNA vaccine induces stronger innate and comparable or better adaptive responses than licensed inactivated vaccines.
Article in NPJ vaccines, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Seasonal vaccination is the most important strategy for mitigating the large disease burden caused by influenza virus. Licensed inactivated influenza virus vaccines rely on slow, egg-based production, underscoring the need for faster, more effective platforms that elicit robust immune responses. Here, we compare the immunogenicity of an unmodified mRNA-lipid nanoparticle vaccine encoding influenza hemagglutinin (HA) from A/Michigan/45/2015 (H1N1)pdm09, A/Singapore/INFIMH-16-0019/2016 (H3N2), B/Phuket/3073/2013 and B/Colorado/06/2017 with two approved, strain-matched, inactivated vaccines (Vaxigrip and Fluad) in non-human primates. The mRNA vaccine induced substantially stronger innate immune activation than Vaxigrip and Fluad, evidenced by rapid upregulation of genes involved in antiviral, antigen presentation and cell migration pathways, expansion of intermediate monocytes and increased secretion of pro-inflammatory cytokines. The mRNA vaccine elicited HA-specific antibodies against all four strains, with levels generally comparable to or exceeding those induced by Vaxigrip and Fluad, although this did not consistently translate to greater neutralizing capacity. Both the mRNA vaccine and Fluad generated higher frequencies of HA-specific memory B and T cell responses compared to Vaxigrip, with the mRNA vaccine inducing a particularly stronger response in the draining lymph nodes, potentially increasing antibody diversity and affinity. Altogether, these findings support the advancement of influenza mRNA vaccines as promising clinical candidates.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.