Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42191687›Full record

ArticleCell discovery2026

Selective cellular localization of UHRF1 safeguards mammalian zygotic genome activation and early embryonic development.

Rui Yan, Xin Cheng, Xin Long, Yating Zhu, Qiancheng Zhang, Fengyuan Sun, Fan Zhang, Mengyue Wang, Ruifeng Zhang, Tianzi Guo and 6 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cell discovery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Rui Yan *State Key Laboratory of Organ Regeneration and Reconstruction, Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China.
Xin Cheng *State Key Laboratory of Organ Regeneration and Reconstruction, Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China.
Xin Long *State Key Laboratory of Organ Regeneration and Reconstruction, Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9923-3821
Yating Zhu *Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, NHC Key Laboratory of Study on Abnormal Gametes and Reproductive Tract, The First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, Anhui, China.
Qiancheng ZhangState Key Laboratory of Organ Regeneration and Reconstruction, Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China.
Fengyuan SunState Key Laboratory of Organ Regeneration and Reconstruction, Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China.
Fan ZhangState Key Laboratory of Organ Regeneration and Reconstruction, Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China.
Mengyue WangState Key Laboratory of Organ Regeneration and Reconstruction, Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China.
Ruifeng ZhangState Key Laboratory of Organ Regeneration and Reconstruction, Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China.
Tianzi GuoState Key Laboratory of Organ Regeneration and Reconstruction, Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China.
Xinling HouState Key Laboratory of Organ Regeneration and Reconstruction, Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China.
Dongmei JiDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, NHC Key Laboratory of Study on Abnormal Gametes and Reproductive Tract, The First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, Anhui, China.
Yunxia CaoDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, NHC Key Laboratory of Study on Abnormal Gametes and Reproductive Tract, The First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, Anhui, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8715-0874
Fei GaoState Key Laboratory of Organ Regeneration and Reconstruction, Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4029-6411
Dan LiangDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, NHC Key Laboratory of Study on Abnormal Gametes and Reproductive Tract, The First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, Anhui, China. liangd@ahmu.edu.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2404-3075
Fan GuoState Key Laboratory of Organ Regeneration and Reconstruction, Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China. guofan@ioz.ac.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0165-073X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Zygotic genome activation (ZGA) is essential for initiating the developmental gene expression program in early embryos. However, whether a gating mechanism orchestrated by a limited number of factors exists in mammals remains debated. In this study, by utilizing an Nlrp14-deficient model that intriguingly disrupts the zygotic localization of UHRF1 and DNMT1, and in combination with comprehensive genetic approaches, we demonstrated that the nuclear exclusion of UHRF1 is essential for mouse ZGA and subsequent developmental progression. Mechanistically, the failure to exclude UHRF1 and DNMT1 from the nucleus in zygotes would impede DNA demethylation in LINE1 elements, promote UHRF1 binding to silence their expression, thereby reducing global chromatin accessibility and inhibiting ZGA. This effect was rescued in Uhrf1/Nlrp14 double knockout (DKO) embryos, which still exhibited heavy DNA methylation, highlighting a dispensable role of UHRF1 in the maintenance of genome-wide DNA methylation after fertilization. Furthermore, reducing DNA methylation through Dnmt1/Nlrp14 DKO or inhibiting the DNA methylation-binding domains of UHRF1 mitigated the adverse effects of nuclear-localized UHRF1 and reactivated the ZGA genes. Finally, we demonstrated that the residual nuclear UHRF1 in normal embryos binds to and facilitates the transcriptional inactivation of specific LTR subtypes that evade DNA demethylation during the genome-wide epigenetic reprogramming. Our findings not only highlight the biological significance of UHRF1 and DNMT1 nuclear exclusion but also elucidate the potentially conserved mechanism that regulates ZGA during mammalian preimplantation development.

Identifiers

PMID42191687
PMCPMC13212597

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.