ArticleNature communications2026
Optimising DNA origami assembly by reducing off-target interactions.
Article in Nature communications, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Advances in DNA nanostructures for pathogenic microorganisms.Materials today. Bio · 2026Review
- Controlling membrane tension by dynamic DNA nanorings.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
DNA origami enables the programmable self-assembly of nucleic acids into precisely defined nanostructures, yet the influence of primary base sequence on folding reliability remains incompletely understood. In particular, off-target interactions between scaffold and staple strands may introduce kinetic traps and reduce assembly yield, even when the intended Watson-Crick complementarity is preserved. Here we show that scaffold sequence strongly affects DNA origami assembly through the prevalence of off-target binding reactions implicit in the chosen base sequence. We developed a multi-objective computational framework that scores candidate scaffold sequences according to four classes of off-target interactions and selects variants predicted to minimise these effects for a given origami design. Using this approach, we identified both favourable and unfavourable scaffold regions from biological and synthetic sequences and tested them experimentally across 2D and 3D DNA origami structures. Atomic force microscopy showed that scaffolds predicted to have fewer off-target interactions consistently folded with higher yield, whereas off-target-prone scaffolds largely failed despite having fully complementary staple sets. Single-molecule optical tweezers further revealed that scaffold variants with fewer predicted off-target interactions assemble into more mechanically uniform origami structures. These results establish off-target sequence effects as a major determinant of origami folding and we provide a software tool to select scaffold sequences that minimise off-target reactions for any DNA origami design.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.