ArticleThe Gerontologist2026
Unravelling cognitive frailty: perceptions, misconceptions, and the path to prevention.
Article in The Gerontologist, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND
objectivesAs populations age, extending healthy life expectancy and reducing morbidity are priorities. Cognitive frailty, the co-occurrence of cognitive impairment and physical frailty without dementia, may offer a window for prevention. However, there is limited evidence on how cognitive frailty is understood, which may undermine recognition and risk reduction. This study provides new insights into how cognitive frailty is conceptualized across public and professional contexts by exploring perceptions, causes, and risk factors of cognitive frailty to inform public health and clinical practice. RESEARCH DESIGN AND
methodsWe conducted 22 semi-structured interviews with members of the public and healthcare professionals. Interviews examined perceived definitions, symptoms, and risk factors. Data were analyzed using reflexive thematic analysis.
resultsThree analytic domains were identified: conceptualizations, manifestations, and risk factors. Participants often conflated cognitive frailty with cognitive impairment or described it as an early stage of dementia. The physical frailty aspect was under-recognized, particularly among public participants. When presented with the international definition, many reframed cognitive frailty as a transitional and potentially preventable state. Healthcare professionals articulated broader symptom profiles and more integrated risk frameworks, whereas the public emphasized observable physical change. Across both groups, mood changes, social withdrawal, and unhealthy lifestyle were viewed as central risks, though their interplay was described with varying detail. DISCUSSION AND IMPLICATIONS: Inconsistent understanding of cognitive frailty may hinder early recognition and prevention. Clearer operational definitions, supportive policy, and targeted education are needed to strengthen detection, risk reduction, and intervention strategies that protect independence in later life.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.