Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42191652›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of sport science2026

Equal Opportunities at the Net: Geometric Insights Into Volleyball Scaling.

Ole M Kleivenes, Per K Rekdal

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of sport science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Ole M KleivenesFaculty of Business Administration and Social Sciences, Molde University College, Molde, Norway.
Per K RekdalFaculty of Logistics, Molde University College, Molde, Norway.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0008-7035-3502

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This paper investigates how volleyball net height can be scaled to account for differences in vertical spike reach. Although such differences are not exclusively determined by sex, the observed gap between male and female players makes sex-based comparisons particularly relevant. The official net heights of 243 cm for men and 224 cm for women differ by 19 cm, a regulation intended to compensate for physical disparities between the sexes. We examine whether this adjustment ensures comparable offensive opportunities when evaluated in terms of observed spike reach. To isolate the geometric effect, other performance-related factors are deliberately disregarded. Using a geometric model linking net height to spike reach, our analysis shows that the current 19 cm gap is insufficient to ensure equal attacking opportunities. At the elite level, geometric equivalence would require lowering the women's net to about 213 cm or raising the men's net to about 253 cm. The disadvantage faced by female players becomes even more pronounced at lower performance levels.

Indexed as

Athletic PerformanceVolleyballFemaleHumansMaleSex Factorsgeometric scalingnet heightsex‐based differencesspike reachvolleyball

Identifiers

PMID42191652
PMCPMC13239937

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.