Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42191641›Full record

ArticlePlant physiology2026

Distinct processes contributing to post-submergence recovery determine leaf age-specific flood resilience in Arabidopsis.

Tom Rankenberg, Maria Angelica Sanclemente, Hongtao Zhang, Hendrika A C F Leeggangers, Omar Orozco-Granados, Muthanna Biddanda Devaiah, Janet Rong Chao, Hans van Veen, Frederica L Theodoulou, Rashmi Sasidharan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Plant physiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Tom RankenbergPlant Stress Resilience, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-7603-4480
Maria Angelica SanclementePlant Stress Resilience, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-5862-7688
Hongtao ZhangRothamsted Research, Harpenden, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-4903-571X
Hendrika A C F LeeggangersPlant Stress Resilience, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-8615-4534
Omar Orozco-GranadosPlant Stress Resilience, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands.ORCID 0009-0009-8314-3763
Muthanna Biddanda DevaiahExperimental and Computational Plant Development, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-7112-288X
Janet Rong ChaoPlant Stress Resilience, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands.ORCID 0009-0003-5055-0879
Hans van VeenPlant Stress Resilience, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-9772-5929
Frederica L TheodoulouRothamsted Research, Harpenden, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-8306-0716
Rashmi SasidharanPlant Stress Resilience, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-6940-0657

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council 21 ROMITIGATION FUND (BB/W510543/1)Dutch Research Council NWO 016.Vidi.171.006Dutch Research Council NWO ALWOP.419Dutch Research Council NWO OCENW.M20.197Dutch Research Council NWO OCENW.M.24.182Green Engineering Institute Strategic Programme Grant BB/X010988/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

While the molecular mechanisms mediating submergence tolerance have been extensively studied, those underpinning age-dependent resilience remain poorly characterized. In Arabidopsis thaliana, submergence elicits a leaf age-dependent phenotype in which senescence and death progress across an age gradient starting with older leaves. Here, we sought to investigate the mechanisms mediating the observed differential flood resilience by interrogating leaf age-specific transcriptome and proteome changes during submergence and recovery. Following submergence, most age-dependent differences were in the magnitude or speed of transcript abundance changes, whereas qualitative leaf age-dependent responses were most apparent during recovery. This included a strong desiccation response in old leaves despite a stronger abscisic acid (ABA)-signaling response. Physiological measurements suggested that faster dehydration was facilitated by submergence-mediated reduction of ABA sensitivity but was not associated with differences in stomatal conductance or cuticle integrity. We also observed a stronger induction in young shoot tissue of genes associated with endoplasmic reticulum stress and the unfolded protein response. Mutants disabled in both unfolded protein response signaling branches were affected in new leaf formation and in the ability to restore the proteome, but not in senescence, suggesting that young tissues activate endoplasmic reticulum stress recovery to permit continuation of growth. Among mitochondrial membrane proteins differentially regulated in young leaves, loss of mitochondrial voltage-dependent anion channel function impacted submergence-recovery tolerance. Our data reveal multiple mechanisms underlying leaf age-dependent differential submergence recovery and demonstrate how an interplay between age-related developmental traits and stress signaling pathways determines tolerance.

Indexed as

ArabidopsisFloodsPlant LeavesAbscisic AcidAdaptation, PhysiologicalArabidopsis ProteinsGene Expression Regulation, PlantMutationPlant SenescenceProteomeSignal TransductionTranscriptomeUnfolded Protein ResponseAbscisic AcidArabidopsis ProteinsProteome

Identifiers

PMID42191641
PMCPMC13591405

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.