ArticleSalud colectiva2026
["Everything was both very fast and very slow at the same time": heterochronic experiences of healthcare professionals in the provision of aid in dying in Spain].
Article in Salud colectiva, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Since its enactment, Organic Law 3/2021 on the Regulation of Euthanasia has altered the experience and professional practice of numerous individuals within the healthcare field in Spain. This impact is evident in how these professionals perceive the various temporalities involved in the process. Using the notion of heterochrony, this article captures this multi-temporality through an interpretive phenomenological analysis of 29 interviews and three focus groups with professionals involved in medical aid in dying. The professionals report a multiplicity of overlapping and interacting times: the time of the law, the patient's time, family time, bio-pharmacological times, and socio-historical time. Tensions are highlighted between the deadlines set by the law and the times experienced by applicants, or between bio-pharmacological temporalities and prevailing professional logics. The article also assesses temporal spaces to support families and transition toward an emerging professional paradigm. Managing this heterochrony poses a challenge for this new role. However, the assembly, synchronization, and composition of the different times could facilitate a harmonious implementation of the law, improving the experience of all involved.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.