ArticleSalud colectiva2026
[Cesarean sections as a biopolitical expression of birth: The case of Neuquén province, Argentina].
Article in Salud colectiva, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cesarean sections continue to increase globally regardless of international recommendations and evidence of their risks when not medically indicated. This study characterizes the time-trend of birth indicators in the province of Neuquén, Argentina, through the perspective of the biopolitics of birth, which understands the cesarean section not merely as a surgical technique, but as a complex device, a biopolitical technology that acts simultaneously on multiple levels. A time-trend analysis was conducted using provincial administrative records, reconstructing indicators of birth rate, infant mortality, and delivery mode from 1970 to 2022. For the period 2011 and 2022, the relationship between changes over time in the cesarean section rate according to socioeconomic and healthcare variables was studied using generalized linear models. The results show a sustained increase in cesarean sections - from 20% in 1995 to 50% in 2022 - in a context marked by declining birth rates and infant mortality, along with patterns that vary according to educational level, age of the pregnant people, type of healthcare facility, and timing of births. These findings suggest that the rise in cesarean sections can be interpreted as part of a broader process of regulating and standardizing modes of giving birth, in which the cesarean section is configured as a technology that contributes to producing predictability and establish standards regarding when and how birth should occur, thereby shaping subjectivities that reshape the social and symbolic conditions of birth.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.