Trial reportAnnals of family medicine2026
Prayer for Pain and Anxiety in a Primary Care Setting: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
Trial report in Annals of family medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeStudies of distant intercessory prayer as complementary medicine yield mixed results. We investigated commonly utilized proximal intercessory prayer (PIP) practices (ie, in-person prayer for another) used to treat pain and anxiety.
methodsWe recruited 180 participants from patients waiting for family medicine appointments. Enrollment for pain required scores of 4 or greater (in the past 7 days) on an 11 point (0 to 10) pain intensity numerical rating scale. Enrollment for anxiety required a score of 10 or greater on the Generalized Anxiety Disorder 7-item (GAD-7) scale, regardless of diagnoses. After their appointments, participants received 5 minutes of either Christian PIP (90 individuals) from a trained volunteer prayer practitioner or music (control, 90 individuals). Questionnaires reassessed pain or anxiety immediately, and 2 and 6 weeks later.
resultsProximal intercessory prayer vs control group participants reported significantly larger (1 to 2 point) reductions in pain immediately and 2 weeks later, and larger (roughly 2 point) reductions in Likert anxiety immediately and GAD-7 at 2 and 6 weeks. Participants in both groups were well-matched, and predominantly Black, female, low-income, and Christian. Outcomes did not vary significantly by most demographic, baseline symptom, religious affiliation, healing prayer belief, or religious intensity measures. The main exception was that Black participants reported larger symptom reductions for pain and anxiety. Participants reported no adverse events. Most participants reported wanting future PIP opportunities along with medical visits.
conclusionProximal intercessory prayer was safe, effective, and well-received as complementary treatment for pain and anxiety. Further studies are warranted. Proximal intercessory prayer may be a low-cost, non-pharmacologic, effective adjunct to standard care with particular relevance for underserved populations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.