Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42191367›Full record

Trial reportAnnals of family medicine2026

Equity Evaluation of an Intervention to Increase Colorectal Cancer Screening at Federally Qualified Health Centers.

Anisha P Ganguly, Meghan C O'Leary, Lindsay R Stradtman, Xianming Tan, Alison T Brenner, Daniel S Reuland

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Annals of family medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Anisha P GangulyDivision of General Medicine and Clinical Epidemiology, Department of Medicine, School of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina anisha_ganguly@med.unc.edu.
Meghan C O'LearyLineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.
Lindsay R StradtmanLineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.
Xianming TanLineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.
Alison T Brenner *Division of General Medicine and Clinical Epidemiology, Department of Medicine, School of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.
Daniel S Reuland *Division of General Medicine and Clinical Epidemiology, Department of Medicine, School of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Racially and ethnically minoritized patients are underscreened for colorectal cancer (CRC), resulting in racial/ethnic disparities. This secondary analysis of a pragmatic patient-randomized clinical trial compared effects of a CRC intervention across race/ethnicity. The multicomponent intervention included a mailed fecal immunochemical test (FIT) for patients in Federally Qualified Health Centers due for screening, plus patient navigation for positive FITs. Among 3,734 patients, 9.7% identified as Hispanic, 29.0% as non-Hispanic Black, and 61.3% as non-Hispanic White, similar across intervention and control arms (

Indexed as

Colorectal NeoplasmsEarly Detection of CancerHealthcare DisparitiesMass ScreeningAgedBlack or African AmericanFemaleHispanic or LatinoHumansMaleMiddle AgedOccult BloodPatient NavigationUnited StatesWhitecolorectal cancer screeningequityFederally Qualified Health Center

Identifiers

PMID42191367
PMCPMC13211961

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.