ArticleBMJ open2026
Capturing heat illness in vulnerable populations through the lens of older adults: a scoping review protocol of health administrative data.
Article in BMJ open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionHeatwaves are among the fastest-growing climate-related threats to human health, increasing in frequency, intensity and duration with climate change. Older adults are disproportionately affected, reflecting intersecting physiological, social and economic vulnerabilities. Beyond mortality, heatwaves drive substantial but often under-recognised morbidity, including emergency visits and hospitalisations for cardiovascular, respiratory, renal and metabolic conditions. Health administrative data provide valuable opportunities to improve understanding of these phenomena and for the quantification of their impacts. However, comparability is limited by heterogeneity in case definitions, that is, the criteria used to determine which health events are counted as cases: some studies only clinically diagnosed heat illness, while others also capture outcomes plausibly triggered or exacerbated by heat. It is further constrained by differences in International Classification of Diseases (ICD) versions, national adaptations, coding practices and adoption timelines across countries. No synthesis has yet mapped these heterogeneous approaches for older adults, despite their over-representation among those most affected by heat-health risks. This heterogeneity limits the ability to capture the true burden of disease and to inform adaptation planning. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: We will conduct a scoping review to map how heat-related diagnoses among older adults are identified and measured in health administrative data. The review will follow the initial methodological framework of Arksey and O'Malley refined by Levac ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethical approval is not required for this review as it involves secondary analysis of published and publicly available data; for more information, contact University of Montreal's Research Integrity department at
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.