Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42191199›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2026

ADNOLA trial: a study-protocol - a randomised controlled trial study comparing adnexal surgery by vNOTES or laparoscopy.

Kristin Stuhr Olsson, Jan Filip Baekelandt, Karin Källén, Luka Matak, Marta Caretto, Martine M L H Wassen, Tommaso Simoncini, Andrea Stuart

Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06964594 (A Randomized Controlled Trial Study Comparing Adnexal Surgery by vNOTES or Laparoscopy), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06964594 nanot yet recruitingnot on this map

A Randomized Controlled Trial Study Comparing Adnexal Surgery by vNOTES or Laparoscopy

TypeinterventionalSponsorRegion SkaneRan2025 to 2028Enrolled200ConditionsOvarian Cysts, Laparoscopic Gynecologic Surgery, vNOTESArmsvNOTES adnexal surgery
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Kristin Stuhr OlssonInstitute of Clinical Sciences, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Lund University, Lund, Sweden kristin.s.olsson@skane.se.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0009-9636-2447
Jan Filip BaekelandtDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Imelda Hospital, Bonheiden, Belgium.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8344-8622
Karin KällénInstitute of Clinical Sciences, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
Luka MatakDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, General Hospital Zadar, University of Zadar, Department of Health Studies, Zadar, Croatia.
Marta CarettoDivision of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy.
Martine M L H WassenDepartment of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Zuyderland Medical Centre, Heerlen, The Netherlands.
Tommaso SimonciniDivision of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy.
Andrea StuartInstitute of Clinical Sciences, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5131-6297

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionAdnexal surgery is one of the most common surgeries performed in women. Minimally invasive methods are on the rise globally as they have been shown to decrease surgical morbidity compared with abdominal surgery. Adnexal surgery by vaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (vNOTES) is the latest innovation. It combines the vaginal approach and endoscopy via the vagina. Large pragmatic randomised controlled trials (RCTs) are lacking comparing outcomes after vNOTES and conventional laparoscopy. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: A multicentre pragmatic RCT aiming to recruit 200 women aged 18 years and above undergoing adnexal surgery for benign disease or prophylactic reasons. Patients will be randomised to vNOTES or laparoscopy. Recruitment will start Q4 2025, and the study is estimated to end 2028.The primary outcome is postoperative pain. Secondary outcomes are units of postoperative opioid and non-opioid analgesics used, perioperative complications, operation time, postoperative complications, readmission, conversion rate and the surgeon's experience. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The national Swedish ethical board at the main centre, Helsingborg Hospital, Sweden, has given ethical agreement (dated 20 March 2025). Before including patients, all centres will require local or national ethical approval. The results of the study will be published in international peer-reviewed journals. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT06964594.

Indexed as

Adnexal DiseasesLaparoscopyNatural Orifice Endoscopic SurgeryAdultFemaleHumansMulticenter Studies as TopicPostoperative ComplicationsPostoperative PainPragmatic Clinical Trials as TopicRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicSwedenVaginaMinimally invasive surgeryRandomized Controlled TrialSURGERY

Identifiers

PMID42191199
PMCPMC13218134

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.