ArticleBMJ open2026
Experience, barriers and facilitators of discharge readiness in patients with acute pancreatitis: a descriptive qualitative study.
Article in BMJ open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesTo explore patients' experiences of discharge readiness following acute pancreatitis (AP) and to identify perceived barriers and facilitators influencing readiness for discharge during the transition from hospital to home.
designA descriptive qualitative study guided by Meleis' Transitions Theory.
settingEmergency and gastroenterology wards of Ren Ji Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
participants16 patients with AP were recruited; all 16 eligible patients approached agreed to participate (100% response rate).
methodsData were collected between December 2024 and January 2025 through semistructured in-depth interviews. Data were analysed using Elo and Kyngäs's three-step qualitative content analysis framework, integrating conventional and directed content analysis. The study adhered to the Consolidated Criteria for Reporting Qualitative Research guidelines.
resultsPatterns of response reflected variability in patients' psychological adaptation during the transition process, including cognitive-emotional responses and relational interactions. Factors influencing discharge readiness were identified across three theoretical domains. Nature of Transitions captured the dynamics of self-management, including awareness, engagement and behavioural evolution. Transition Conditions reflected the complexity of socioecological determinants, including age and life stage, health literacy, financial resources and occupational and cultural influences. Nursing Therapeutics highlighted the discordance between professional support and patient needs, particularly in relation to information provision, dietary management and care continuity.
conclusionsBuilding on Meleis' Transitions Theory, this study provides an empirically grounded understanding of discharge readiness among patients with AP as a dynamic, multifactorial process. Our findings extend the theory by demonstrating that discharge readiness is shaped by the interaction between individual self-management, socioecological determinants, psychological adaptations and professional support. Addressing gaps in professional health information, personalised and structured dietary management and continuity of care is essential to enhance discharge readiness and support safe, sustainable recovery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.