Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42191188›Full record

Trial reportBMJ open2026

Effectiveness of an anti-inflammatory diet intervention and cognitive behavioural therapy in endometriosis: protocol for a randomised controlled clinical trial.

Emma Huijs, Loutje van der Sman, Lieke Wirken, Heidi Smj Delcliseur, Esther G Winter, Nicole M de Roos, Renate G van der Molen, Joukje M Oosterman, Paola Viganò, Andrew W Horne and 4 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMJ open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06332560 (Pain in Endometriosis And the Relation to Lifestyle), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06332560 narecruitingnot on this map

Pain in Endometriosis And the Relation to Lifestyle: Effectiveness of a Dietary Intervention and Cognitive Behavioral Therapy in Endometriosis-associated Pain

TypeinterventionalSponsorRadboud University Medical CenterRan2024 to 2027Enrolled250ConditionsEndometriosis, AdenomyosisArmsAnti-inflammatory diet (DI), Cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Emma HuijsDepartment of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, GE, the Netherlands emma.huijs@radboudumc.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0005-1048-1332
Loutje van der SmanDepartment of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, GE, the Netherlands.
Lieke WirkenDepartment of Medical Psychology, Amphia Hospital, Breda, the Netherlands.
Heidi Smj DelcliseurDepartment of Medical Psychology, Rijnstate Hospital, Arnhem, the Netherlands.
Esther G WinterDepartment of Medical Psychology, Rijnstate Hospital, Arnhem, the Netherlands.
Nicole M de RoosDivision of Human Nutrition and Health, Wageningen University & Research, Wageningen, the Netherlands.
Renate G van der MolenDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, Laboratory for Medical Immunology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
Joukje M OostermanDonders Institute for Brain Cognition and Behaviour, Radboud University, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
Paola ViganòDepartment of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3674-5912
Andrew W HorneInstitute of Regeneration and Repair, The University of Edinburgh MRC Centre for Reproductive Health, Edinburgh, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9656-493X
Marie-Madeleine DolmansGynaecology Research Laboratory, Department of Gynaecology, Institut de Recherche Expérimentale et Clinique, Université catholique de Louvain, Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium.
Janneke S Hoogstad-van EvertDepartment of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Amphia Hospital, Breda, the Netherlands.
Annemiek W NapDepartment of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, GE, the Netherlands.
EUmetriosis Working Group

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionTreatment for women with endometriosis is only partially or temporarily effective. Moreover, medical hormonal treatment is associated with debilitating side effects and interferes with fertility, while surgery has a relatively high risk of complications. Meanwhile, women with endometriosis show increasing interest in implementing lifestyle interventions to alleviate symptoms and improve health-related quality of life (HRQoL). Integrating these lifestyle interventions can provide a holistic approach to the treatment of this debilitating disease. However, scientific evidence supporting the effectiveness of these interventions is limited. This study is designed to investigate the effectiveness of two lifestyle interventions and the combination of both: an anti-inflammatory diet intervention (AIDI) could improve immune cell function and reduce inflammation, resulting in improved HRQoL and alleviating pain. In addition, the integration of cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) aims to provide insight into pain mechanisms and coping with pain, and to assist in sustaining dietary adjustments. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The Pain in Endometriosis And the Relation to Lifestyle (PEARL) study is a five-arm randomised controlled trial with a pre-post factorial design with two factors: an AIDI and CBT. The study population will consist of 250 premenopausal women, of whom 200 are diagnosed with endometriosis and experience pain symptoms and 50 are healthy controls (HC). Women with endometriosis will be recruited from one academic tertiary and five secondary hospitals in the Netherlands. They will be randomised (1:1:1:1) among four intervention groups: standard care (SC) (SC group), SC and an AIDI (SC + AIDI group), SC and CBT (SC + CBT group), and SC, AIDI and CBT (SC + AIDI + CBT group). Women with endometriosis will visit the hospital twice during the intervention period, at the start (T0) and end (T2) of the 13-week intervention period. HC will not undergo any of the interventions and will have one hospital visit (T0). Participants will complete questionnaires regarding pain symptoms, HRQoL, physical activity level, sleep, diet quality, pain cognitions, and stress at T0 and T2. Furthermore, they are instructed to collect menstrual effluent, a vaginal swab and a faecal sample. During the study visits, peripheral blood will be drawn and scalp hair samples will be taken. The primary outcome is average pain, measured using a numerical rating scale. Secondary outcomes focus on HRQoL, inflammation, immune system characteristics, vaginal- and gut microbiome, and hair cortisol levels. These are considered to reflect potentially underlying mechanisms of the effect of both interventions on the primary outcome. Biological samples and questionnaires of women with endometriosis and HC will be compared to establish the differences in secondary outcomes. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This study protocol has been approved (approval number: NL86247.091.24) by the METC Oost-Nederland from Radboud University Medical Centre on July 11, 2024. Prior to participation, participants are required to provide informed consent. The results will be widely disseminated through scientific peer-reviewed journals, and presentation to a broad audience in scientific meetings, congresses, patient meetings, as well as in policy-relevant forums. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT06332560.

Indexed as

Cognitive Behavioral TherapyEndometriosisInflammationAdultFemaleHumansLife StyleQuality of LifeResearch DesignTreatment OutcomeGYNAECOLOGYIMMUNOLOGYInflammationNUTRITION & DIETETICSPAIN MANAGEMENTQuality of Life

Identifiers

PMID42191188
PMCPMC13218105

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.