Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42191186›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2026

Dual versus single implant fixation for geriatric distal femur fractures: protocol for a randomised, controlled pilot study at five US level 1 trauma centres.

Justin Haller, Chukwuebuka C Achebe, Garret Oman, Sanjit Konda, Matthew Garner, Brandon Yuan, Lucas S Marchand, Graham J DeKeyser

Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05292313 (Pilot for Dual Implant Versus Single Implant Distal End of Femur), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05292313 naenrolling by invitationnot on this map

Pilot for Dual Implant Versus Single Implant Distal End of Femur (pDISIDE Femur)

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of UtahRan2022 to 2027Enrolled80ConditionsDistal Femur FractureArmsSingle distal femur implant, Dual distal femur implants
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Justin HallerUniversity of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA justin.haller@hsc.utah.edu.
Chukwuebuka C AchebeUniversity of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7792-9649
Garret OmanUniversity of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA.
Sanjit KondaDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, New York University (NYU), New York, New York, USA.
Matthew GarnerUniversity of Pittsburgh Medical Center - Harrisburg (UPMC-H), Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.
Brandon YuanMayo Clinic, Rochester, New York, USA.
Lucas S MarchandUniversity of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4499-6669
Graham J DeKeyserOrthopaedics and Rehabilitation, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionGeriatric distal femur fractures are associated with mortality rates exceeding 20%, comparable to hip fractures. Traditional single implant fixation often requires weight-bearing restrictions that delay recovery. This pilot study aims to assess the feasibility of conducting a multicentre randomised controlled trial comparing dual vs single implant fixation for geriatric distal femur fractures. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This multicentre, prospective, randomised controlled pilot trial will enrol 80 participants aged 60 years or older with displaced distal femur fractures at five US level 1 trauma centres. Patients will be randomly allocated 1:1 to receive either single implant (lateral plate or retrograde nail) or dual implant (nail-plate or dual plate) fixation. All patients will be permitted immediate weight-bearing. The primary outcome is feasibility assessed through enrolment rate (80 patients in 12 months), protocol adherence (≥90%) and follow-up retention (≥85% at 12 months). Secondary outcomes include post-surgical mobility (AM-PAC, TUG), patient-reported outcomes (PROMIS-PF, PROMIS-29), mortality (90-day and 1 year) and complication rates. Analyses will be on an intention-to-treat basis. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The protocol was approved by the University of Utah Institutional Review Board (IRB_00149119) and IRBs at all participating centres. Written informed consent will be obtained from participants or legally authorised representatives. Findings will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications and conference presentations. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT05292313.

Indexed as

Femoral FracturesFemoral Fractures, DistalFracture Fixation, InternalAgedAged, 80 and overBone NailsBone PlatesFeasibility StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMulticenter Studies as TopicPilot ProjectsProspective StudiesRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicTrauma CentersFractures, BoneGERIATRIC MEDICINEIntra-Articular FracturesPragmatic Clinical TrialTrauma management

Identifiers

PMID42191186
PMCPMC13218087

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.