ArticleJournal of Korean medical science2026
Two-Step Ensemble Convolutional Neural Networks for Colonoscopic Biopsy Classification Resembling Pathologists' Process.
Article in Journal of Korean medical science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundColorectal cancer (CRC) is a leading cause of mortality worldwide, and early examination via colonoscopy is increasingly used to prevent CRC mortality. Recently, studies have attempted utilizing artificial intelligence for the classification of CRC. However, datasets were limited in these studies, and the limited number of findings resulting from these studies are not specific to cancerous or noncancerous findings. We present a full pipeline of ensemble deep learning approach to classify five diagnostic categories. Through this pipeline, whole slide images (WSIs) exhibiting low quality can be filtered out before being processed by the computer-aided diagnosis system.
methodsA dataset of 18,922 CRC WSIs collected and labeled as non-tumor, hyperplastic polyp, adenoma, adenocarcinoma, and neuroendocrine tumor (NET, carcinoid). We developed two models: clustering-constrained attention multiple instance learning model was used to classify adenocarcinomas, adenomas, NET, and non-dysplastic lesion classes. EfficientNet then distinguished between non-tumor and hyperplastic polyp for WSIs classified as non-dysplastic lesion class in the first step.
resultsThe proposed ensemble pipeline, which resembles the process of analysis from the pathologists, showed better performance even with multiple classes CRC. The micro-, macro-, and weighted-F1-scores were 86.57%, 83.83%, and 86.86%, respectively. Notably, the NET classification tasks scored an F1-score of 87.18%.
conclusionThe proposed ensemble model addresses common challenges in automated CRC diagnosis, offering reliable solutions with safeguards for exceptional cases. It enhances clinical practice by accurately classifying multiple CRC types. In conclusion, this method is effective where scanned colorectal WSIs can be of low quality for real-world diagnosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.