ReviewAmerican journal of human genetics2026
Guidance on communication and informed consent with patients and their families for experimental individualized treatments.
Review in American journal of human genetics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
With advanced tools and techniques, it is now possible to genetically diagnose an increasing number of individuals with rare diseases for which no disease-modifying treatment exists. For a subset of affected individuals, it is possible to develop individualized interventions to modulate and/or correct the underlying genetic defect. Communicating to such individuals and their guardians about the potential risks and benefits of such experimental therapies poses special challenges. In addition to typical procedures used for consenting subjects of clinical trials or off-label therapy, individualized therapy protocols involve a complex interplay between biological plausibility, preclinical data, risks, uncertainties, and ethical considerations of equipoise, especially since individualized treatments are usually developed for serious conditions. While no formal guidance exists, this perspective was drafted from the shared experience of clinicians and developers involved in treating affected individuals with individualized antisense oligonucleotides (ASOs) to provide preliminary guidance on communication and consent. As additional experience and expertise accrue over time, we anticipate that these principles will evolve with subsequent modifications to this document.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.