ArticleJMIR medical education2026
Generative AI's Impact on the Mental Health of Medical Students: Scenario Analysis.
Article in JMIR medical education, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Generative artificial intelligence (AI) is quickly changing medical education, even as medical students still face high levels of stress, anxiety, and burnout. These simultaneous trends-technological upheaval and ongoing mental health issues-bring up important questions about how future doctors will be trained and supported. Understanding how these factors might influence each other is crucial for developing resilient, future-ready medical education systems. Objective: We carried out a foresight study using scenario analysis to examine potential futures at the crossroads of generative AI adoption and medical students' mental health. An initial environmental scan of the literature was conducted to pinpoint emerging trends and weak signals related to AI in medical education and well-being. These phenomena were categorized within a macro-meso-micro framework and analyzed through a multilevel sociotechnical change perspective. The study focused on 2 principal factors: the extent of generative AI integration into medical curricula and the availability of mental health support, as key drivers and critical uncertainties influencing future trajectories. Methods: These dimensions resulted in 4 distinct scenarios: Analog Happiness (high support and low AI integration), Gen AI Paradise (high support and high integration), Disconnected Struggles (low support and low integration), and Gen AI Takeover (low support and high integration). Each scenario demonstrates how various institutional responses can impact students' digital readiness, psychological well-being, and professional growth. For each one, we identified the main systemic risks and suggested immediate institutional measures to address them. Results: The findings suggest that technological innovation and mental health support must coevolve in medical education. Prioritizing one without the other risks producing either digitally unprepared or emotionally fragile physicians. Faculty readiness, ethical frameworks, and participatory curriculum design are critical to ensuring balanced integration. We formulated practical recommendations tailored to students, educators, and other stakeholders to guide balanced adaptation. Conclusions: Generative AI is more than just an additional tool in medical education; it is a systemic force that redefines how future physicians learn and operate. If technological change and student mental health are tackled separately, medical education risks creating graduates who are either unprepared for digital demands or mentally overwhelmed. This study highlights key systemic risks and suggests initial institutional steps to address them, providing a foresight-driven framework to assist educators and policymakers in responsible AI integration while safeguarding the well-being of future doctors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.