Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42190242›Full record

ArticleJMIR cancer2026

Planning and Developing a Symptom Diary Intervention for Breast Cancer Survivors With Concerns About Medication Brands (ENABLE Study): User-Centered Design Approach.

Yolanda Eraso, Duncan Stewart, Ruth Edwards, Bal Nanray, Jacqueline Cochrane

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR cancer, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Yolanda ErasoSchool of Social Sciences and Professions, London Metropolitan University, London, England, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-7754-5960
Duncan StewartSchool of Social Sciences and Professions, London Metropolitan University, London, England, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-7355-4280
Ruth EdwardsDepartment of Pharmacy, University of Wolverhampton, Wolverhampton, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-1431-2772
Bal NanrayPatient representative, Essex, United Kingdom.ORCID 0009-0007-9371-2224
Jacqueline CochraneThe Open University, Milton Keynes, England, United Kingdom.ORCID 0009-0005-6673-7544

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundApproximately 80% of breast cancers are estrogen receptor positive, and following initial tumor treatment, patients are prescribed hormone therapy (HT) drugs (tamoxifen, letrozole, anastrozole, and exemestane) for 5-10 years. These drugs are known to cause several side effects. Additionally, a small number of studies have identified that changing medication brands (generics) can negatively affect patients' side effects, attitudes, and acceptance of HT. However, no effective intervention currently exists to address patients' concerns about generic switching.

objectiveThis study explores whether a symptom diary appears to be an acceptable approach for patients and pharmacists to address brand concerns, and provides a detailed report of the planning and development stages of a coproduced diary intervention.

methodsThis paper presents the studies conducted during the planning and development stages of the symptom diary, following the person-based approach, which combines theory-, evidence-, and person-based approaches to ensure interventions are acceptable and easy to implement. The study included the following stages: (1) the planning stage, which involved analysis of an online patient forum (n=277), interviews with patients (n=9), and interviews with pharmacists (n=7). Data triangulation was used to present an integrated set of findings. (2) The development stage, which involved a rapid scoping review of the literature on the use of diaries among patients with cancer, coproduction workshops with patients and pharmacists (n=17), pharmacist interviews (n=11), and consultation with our patient advisory group (n=5). Analysis was informed by evidence synthesis, behavior change analyses, and iterative stakeholder consultations.

resultsIn the intervention planning stage, patients and pharmacists perceived community pharmacies as the ideal setting for HT medication consultations. Both groups proposed using a patient diary to support awareness and attribution of drug-related symptoms. Pharmacists described patients' requests for specific brands as difficult to manage, whereas patients reported that switching brands undermined confidence in medication-taking. In the development stage, the scoping review (n=29 papers) identified barriers and facilitators related to diary use, and workshops explored diary format and content. These findings informed the intervention planning table and the first diary prototype. Pharmacist interviews and patient feedback informed the development of 2 further prototypes. The symptom diary is a self-monitoring tool designed to enhance self-efficacy in HT medication-taking behaviors. It includes recording side effects from brands alongside physical, psychological, and environmental factors; actions taken to manage symptoms; and problem-solving and planning before a medication consultation to facilitate personalized feedback from pharmacists.

conclusionsWe preliminarily developed an intervention that appears engaging, relevant, and acceptable for patients to self-monitor their symptoms. Further revisions informed by user feedback will be incorporated after testing ENABLE (Medication Brand Changes in Hormone Therapy for Breast Cancer: A Community Pharmacy Intervention Development to Improve Patients' Adherence and Quality of Life) in community pharmacies.

trial registrationISRCTN Registry ISRCTN15089342; http://www.isrctn.com/ISRCTN15089342.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsCancer SurvivorsDiaries as TopicUser-Centered DesignAdherence InterventionsAdultAgedFemaleHumansMiddle Agedbehavioral sciencesbreast cancer survivorscommunity pharmacyintervention developmentqualitative methodssymptom diary

Identifiers

PMID42190242
PMCPMC13250491

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.