Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42189987›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2026

Social interactions in isolated, confined, and extreme environments: A study of Antarctic winter teams using wearable sensors.

Andrea Cantisani, Jan B Schmutz, Pedro Marques-Quinteiro, Lorenzo Dall'Amico, Ciro Cattuto, Mirko Antino, Walter J Eppich, Katharina Stegmayer, Sebastian Walther

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Andrea Cantisani *Translational Research Center, University Hospital of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Bern 3000, Switzerland.ORCID 0009-0004-0135-3059
Jan B Schmutz *Department of Psychology, University of Zurich, Zurich 8050, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-0181-807X
Pedro Marques-QuinteiroIntrepid Lab, School of Economic Sciences and Organizations, Lusófona University, Lisboa 1749-024, Portugal.
Lorenzo Dall'AmicoInstitute for Scientific Interchange Foundation, Torino 10123, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-7493-6421
Ciro CattutoInstitute for Scientific Interchange Foundation, Torino 10123, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-9526-4364
Mirko AntinoDepartment of Methodology for Behavioral Sciences, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Madrid 28040, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-7578-4899
Walter J EppichFaculty of Medicine, Dentistry, and Health Sciences, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC 3010, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-4127-2825
Katharina StegmayerTranslational Research Center, University Hospital of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Bern 3000, Switzerland.
Sebastian WaltherTranslational Research Center, University Hospital of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Bern 3000, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0003-4026-3561

Funding

Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung (SNF) PCEFP1_203374WBF | Staatssekretariat für Bildung, Forschung und Innovation (SBFI) REF-1131-61001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Long-duration space missions expose crews to extreme psychological and social stressors due to prolonged isolation and confinement. To examine how such conditions impact individual and team functioning, we studied a 10-mo Antarctic overwintering mission at Concordia Station, an analog for spaceflight, using self-report measures and wearable proximity sensors. Twelve crew members were assessed at four time-points. Results revealed a progressive increase in feelings of loneliness and conflict, while cohesion and individual performance declined. Close-range interactions were positively associated with conflicts and paranoid thoughts and negatively related with individual performance, suggesting that more frequent contact did not equate to social support. Social interactions became increasingly clustered within national groups, highlighting the risk of social fragmentation and crew polarization. The use of wearable sensors proved feasible for long-term use in extreme environments. These findings underscore the importance of monitoring psychosocial functioning during extended missions and suggest that close confinement, rather than isolation alone, may trigger interpersonal strain.

Indexed as

Confined SpacesExtreme EnvironmentsInterpersonal RelationsSocial InteractionSocial IsolationWearable Electronic DevicesAntarctic RegionsGroup DynamicsHumansLonelinessSeasonsSpace FlightICE environmentssocial isolationsocial networksspace analogsteam dynamics

Identifiers

PMID42189987
PMCPMC13229265

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.