Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42189859›Full record

ArticlePloS one2026

Subsequent memory effect in the inferior frontal gyrus revealed by fNIRS.

Petra Bíró, Silvy H P Collin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Petra BíróDepartment of Computational Cognitive Science, Tilburg School of Humanities and Digital Sciences, Tilburg University, Tilburg, The Netherlands.
Silvy H P CollinDepartment of Computational Cognitive Science, Tilburg School of Humanities and Digital Sciences, Tilburg University, Tilburg, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-9257-8664

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A central finding in memory research is the subsequent memory effect, which describes consistent neural differences during encoding, where later remembered events elicit higher brain activity than those that are later forgotten, which has been reliably replicated with both EEG and fMRI for the past decades. Replicating the subsequent memory effect using fNIRS could enable research opportunities that are difficult to pursue with other methods, including studies with children, patient populations, or experiments in highly naturalistic settings. Therefore, our study investigated whether the prefrontal cortex is differentially involved in subsequently remembered versus subsequently forgotten stimuli using fNIRS. Our results showed that in particular channels mapping onto the inferior frontal gyrus showed more activation during encoding of subsequently remembered events compared to subsequently forgotten events. These results demonstrate that fNIRS can reliably capture the subsequent memory effect, providing new opportunities to study memory mechanisms across diverse populations and real-world contexts.

Indexed as

MemoryPrefrontal CortexAdultBrain MappingFemaleHumansMaleSpectroscopy, Near-InfraredYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID42189859
PMCPMC13210360

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.